Openly LGBTQ+ directors now hold just 45 Fortune 500 board seats, down from 50 in 2024, as new data raises concerns about the lack of new directors coming through the pipeline.
LGBTQ+ representation on Fortune 500 boards has fallen for the first time since tracking began in 2022, raising fresh concerns about whether companies are building strong enough pipelines of LGBTQ+ talent into senior leadership and board roles. The latest count from PRISM, the Association of LGBTQ+ Corporate Directors, using data from Equilar, identifies 45 Fortune 500 board seats held by openly LGBTQ+ directors, down from a restated 50 in 2024.
Those seats are held by just 39 individuals across 43 companies and account for around 0.8% of approximately 5,400 Fortune 500 board positions. By comparison, around 9% of US adults identify as LGBTQ+, according to Gallup. That means fewer than one in 10 of America’s largest companies has a single openly LGBTQ+ director.
The reversal comes as wider progress on board diversity is also showing signs of strain. Women now hold 29.2% of Russell 3000 board seats, down from 30.1% a year earlier, marking the first annual decline in more than a decade, according to 50/50 Women on Boards.
YEARS OF PROGRESS GO INTO REVERSE
Fair Play Talks has been tracking the lack of LGBTQ+ representation at the highest levels of business for several years. Back in 2021, Fair Play Talks reported Out Leadership research showing that only around two dozen Fortune 500 board seats were held by openly LGBTQ+ leaders, highlighting how limited representation was at the time.
That same year, Suki Sandhu OBE argued in a Fair Play Talks guest column that companies needed to set targets for LGBT+ inclusion in senior leadership, backed by better data, stronger pipelines and greater accountability. Earlier in 2021, INvolve also called for targets to increase LGBT+ representation in the C-suite, reflecting concerns that too few LGBTQ+ professionals were progressing into the senior roles that typically feed board appointments.
PRISM’s own comparable series subsequently rose from 36 Fortune 500 board seats in 2022 to 40 in 2023 and a restated 50 in 2024. The fall to 45 in 2026 therefore represents the first reversal in PRISM’s tracking.
WHY LGBTQ+ BOARD REPRESENTATION HAS FALLEN
The decline does not simply mean companies have removed LGBTQ+ directors. Part of it is structural. PRISM says 11 seats included in its 2024 count have disappeared, with at least six lost as companies themselves left the Fortune 500 through liquidation, takeovers or going private. Rite Aid was liquidated, while Walgreens, Nordstrom and SpartanNash were taken private. Foot Locker was acquired by Dick’s Sporting Goods, while Discover was absorbed by Capital One.
Several of the directors affected subsequently secured other board positions. Nancy Schlichting moved from Walgreens to Baxter, while Jennifer Wong followed Discover into Capital One’s boardroom. Darlene Nicosia, who was listed as LGBTQ+ in Foot Locker’s 2023 proxy disclosure, joined Ball in September. Jacinto Hernandez, who appeared on PRISM’s 2022 list at Altria, returned to the Fortune 500 at Devon Energy in May.
The bigger concern, however, is the number of genuinely new directors entering the pipeline. According to PRISM, only one director is genuinely new to the Fortune 500 LGBTQ+ cohort since 2024 – Robert Chavez, former President and CEO of Hermès Americas, who joined Macy’s board in 2025. That suggests the same relatively small group of established LGBTQ+ directors is moving between boards rather than a broader generation of first-time directors emerging.
PROGRESS IS NEVER GUARANTEED
For Suki Sandhu OBE, Founder and CEO of Audeliss and INvolve, the latest findings demonstrate why visibility alone is not enough to deliver sustainable representation at the highest levels of business. “These figures are a stark reminder that progress is never guaranteed. Five years on, the decline in openly LGBTQ+ representation on Fortune 500 boards tells us that visibility alone is not enough. Too many organisations have focused on statements alone, rather than building the sponsorship, succession planning and leadership pipelines that enable LGBTQ+ talent to reach the most senior levels,” shared Sandhu.
“If companies are serious about inclusion, they must treat representation as a business priority with clear accountability, measurable goals and sustained investment. Diverse leadership doesn’t happen by chance. It requires leaders to actively create pathways for talented LGBTQ+ professionals to progress, thrive and ultimately shape decisions at the very highest levels.”
Sandhu’s comments echo the concerns he raised in 2021 about the need to move beyond visible role models and address the structural barriers that can prevent LGBTQ+ professionals reaching senior leadership. The pipeline matters because board recruitment frequently draws on executives who have already reached senior operational or C-suite roles. If LGBTQ+ professionals remain underrepresented at those levels, the pool from which future directors are traditionally selected remains narrow too.
LGBTQ+ WOMEN BEAR MOST OF THE LOSSES
The findings also reveal a striking intersectional dimension. Women hold 60% of openly LGBTQ+ Fortune 500 board seats – around double women’s 29.2% share of Russell 3000 board seats overall. Yet they also accounted for eight of the 11 LGBTQ+ seats that disappeared.
Lesbian and queer women have therefore been an important source of diversity in corporate America’s boardrooms while also bearing most of the latest losses. The figures coincide with a wider reversal in women’s board representation. When Fair Play Talks reported on US board diversity in 2024, women had reached around 30% of Russell 3000 board seats, although the pace of improvement was already slowing.
The latest 50/50 Women on Boards figures show that representation has now slipped to 29.2%. The pattern reinforces an important point: headline diversity gains do not necessarily mean every group is progressing at the same rate.
REPRESENTATION REMAINS CONCENTRATED
PRISM’s data also suggests LGBTQ+ representation remains concentrated among a relatively small group of experienced directors. Six individuals hold two Fortune 500 board seats each. The average age per LGBTQ+ board seat has risen from 61 to 63, while average tenure has increased from 7.2 years to 8.5 years.
Long-serving directors can bring significant experience and institutional knowledge. But without a strong flow of new candidates, representation becomes vulnerable when directors retire, companies merge or boards restructure. The wider boardroom pipeline has shown similar warning signs.
In 2024, Fair Play Talks reported that racial diversity among newly appointed US directors was slowing, reinforcing concerns about whether diverse talent pipelines were broad enough to sustain previous gains.
INTERSECTIONALITY ON BOARDS
PRISM found that people of colour hold 40% of openly LGBTQ+ Fortune 500 board seats, unchanged from 2024. Departures by three Black and Latino directors were offset by the arrival or return of Robert Chavez and Jacinto Hernandez.
The findings reinforce the need to look at representation intersectionally rather than treating LGBTQ+ identity, gender and race as completely separate measures. A board can appear to become more diverse overall while individual groups remain significantly underrepresented.
PRISM says it could still identify no openly transgender or non-binary director on a Fortune 500 board. The finding demonstrates how uneven representation remains even within the LGBTQ+ community. It also underlines why broad LGBTQ+ statistics can conceal significant disparities between lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and non-binary people.
LGBTQ+ DIRECTORS IN LEADERSHIP ROLES
Where openly LGBTQ+ directors do sit on Fortune 500 boards, some occupy influential leadership positions. PRISM identifies eight of the 45 seats as board leadership roles. They include Tim Cook, who became Apple’s executive chair in September after 15 years as CEO and remains lead director at Nike. Barry Diller chairs Expedia, while Jim Fitterling is executive chair at Dow and lead director at 3M. Amy Lane at NextEra, Ruth Ann Marshall at Regions and Lorrie Norrington at Colgate-Palmolive also serve as lead directors.
Those roles matter because chairs, lead directors and nomination committee leaders can influence succession planning and who is considered for future board appointments. Representation is therefore not only about who gets a seat at the table. It also matters who holds influence over who comes next.
DISCLOSURE WEAKENS AS REPRESENTATION FALLS
The decline comes at a significant moment for board diversity transparency. California’s AB 979, which sought to increase representation from underrepresented communities on boards, was struck down in court. Nasdaq’s board diversity rules – which included disclosure requirements covering LGBTQ+ directors – are also no longer in force following a US appeals court ruling. In 2020, Nasdaq pushed for greater diversity and transparency in US corporate boardrooms.
The following year, the SEC approved Nasdaq’s board diversity rules, requiring listed companies to publicly disclose board-level diversity information and either meet specified diversity objectives or explain why they had not. With those rules now gone, independent tracking exercises such as PRISM’s annual count have become increasingly important.
As Fabrice Houdart, Founder and Executive Director of PRISM, noted in highlighting the latest findings, “Someone has to keep counting.” Without consistent disclosure, it becomes harder for investors, employees, boards and other stakeholders to determine whether representation is progressing, stagnating or moving backwards.
THE CONVERSATION WILL CONTINUE IN NEW YORK
Houdart believes board diversity has also lost some of the prominence it once held within corporate governance conversations. “For years, board diversity was one of the defining conversations in corporate governance. That conversation has gone quiet,” said Houdart. “But the talent hasn’t gone anywhere. What matters now is the network: qualified directors who know each other and recommend each other. That is exactly what PRISM exists to support.”
The findings will be among the issues discussed at PRISM’s fourth annual LGBTQ+ Corporate Directors’ Summit in New York on 26 October. Hosted at Grant Thornton, the event will bring together around 150 corporate directors, CEOs, investors, governance leaders, board recruiters and senior executives.
WHAT BOARDS AND COMMITTEES CAN DO
The findings suggest that simply retaining existing diverse directors will not be enough to create sustainable representation. Companies also need to increase the number of LGBTQ+ leaders receiving their first board opportunity.
1. Build the leadership pipeline earlier
Board diversity begins long before a vacancy appears. Employers should examine whether LGBTQ+ talent has equitable access to promotion, profit-and-loss responsibility, strategically important assignments and senior operational roles that commonly lead to board opportunities.
2. Increase sponsorship
Mentoring can provide valuable guidance, but senior sponsorship can directly influence career progression. Leaders can actively advocate for talented LGBTQ+ professionals, provide access to influential networks and put individuals forward for senior roles and external board opportunities.
3. Widen board recruitment networks
Nomination committees and executive search firms should avoid repeatedly drawing candidates from the same established networks. Qualified executives should not automatically be overlooked because they have not previously served on a Fortune 500 board.
4. Create more first-time board opportunities
If the same established directors continue moving between boards, representation may remain concentrated. Companies can widen access through subsidiary boards, advisory boards, board apprenticeship programmes and opportunities for senior leaders to gain meaningful governance experience.
5. Make succession planning more inclusive
Companies should identify potential future board candidates before vacancies arise and provide high-potential leaders with exposure to boards and senior decision-making.
6. Set measurable goals and track progress
As Sandhu argues, sustainable representation requires clear accountability and measurable goals. Companies need to understand where LGBTQ+ talent is progressing – and where people are dropping out of the leadership pipeline. Where legally and practically appropriate, voluntary self-identification data can help organisations identify barriers across recruitment, retention and progression.
7. Look at intersectional representation
Organisations should not treat gender, ethnicity and LGBTQ+ representation as entirely separate issues. PRISM’s finding that women accounted for eight of the 11 lost LGBTQ+ seats demonstrates how progress on one measure can disguise setbacks on another.
8. Maintain transparency
Reduced regulatory requirements do not prevent companies voluntarily reporting board composition and progress. Without transparent data, organisations cannot easily establish baselines, identify gaps or demonstrate whether commitments are producing meaningful change.
PROGRESS CANNOT BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED
Corporate America’s boards remain more diverse than they were a decade ago. Earlier studies showed only a few dozen openly LGBTQ+ directors across Fortune 500 boards, and PRISM’s own data subsequently showed representation rising between 2022 and 2024.
But the latest count demonstrates that progress is not automatic. Part of the five-seat fall reflects acquisitions, takeovers and other structural changes rather than companies actively removing LGBTQ+ directors. The more significant concern is that too few new directors appear to be entering the pipeline to replace those losses. It is the same underlying issue LGBTQ+ inclusion advocates were raising five years ago.
Fair Play Talks documented calls for stronger LGBT+ leadership targets, greater C-suite representation and greater board-level visibility at a time when only around two dozen openly LGBTQ+ leaders were identified across Fortune 500 boards. Five years later, Sandhu’s latest warning points to the same challenge.
Diverse leadership doesn’t happen by chance. Without sustained investment in sponsorship, progression, succession and first-time board opportunities, greater visibility at the top will not necessarily translate into a sustainable pipeline behind it.
Check out the latest data from PRISM here.
RELATED ARTICLES
Women are losing ground in US boardrooms, with their share of new appointments falling sharply to just 22.7%, new research reveals.
Only 24 out of 5,690 Director seats in Fortune 500 companies are held by openly LGBTQ leaders, confirmed Out Leadership’s study.
Why it’s time for organisations to set targets to increase LGBT+ representation in senior leadership ranks.
INvolve, the global network championing D&I in business, is calling for companies to set targets to increase LGBT+ representation in the C-suite.
Despite slow overall growth, racial and gender diversity on corporate boards is making modest gains, a new report has revealed.
Corporate America’s boards are more diverse than ever, but racial diversity among new directors has recently slowed, study reveals.
Nasdaq has filed a proposal with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to approve new rules that will force listed company boards to become more diverse and transparent.
The SEC approves Nasdaq’s proposal requiring its public listed companies to disclose gender and racial diversity of their boards, and eventually have at least two diverse directors.
